The internet needs a hobby that doesn't involve starting fights
If you have spent even five seconds lurking on wrestling forums or the darker corners of social media, you have seen the narrative. The story goes that Booker T—the five-time WCW champion himself—is some kind of secret agent for WWE trying to bury All Elite Wrestling with every breath he takes on his podcast. It is exhausting, it is reductive, and frankly, it is based on nothing but selective editing.
Booker T decided to pull the goalie on this narrative recently, effectively telling everyone to dial back the outrage. The man has spent a lifetime in the business, moving from the gritty independent scene to the lights of Madison Square Garden. If he has a critique, it is usually because he knows exactly what goes into putting a show on television.
As Ringside News reported, the former King of the Ring is tired of the "AEW hater" label. He is a guy who built a legacy on being an entertainer while respecting the craft. Reducing his analysis to a petty tribal war is a colossal waste of time for everyone involved.
The problem with being a "wrestling purist"
Let's be clear: Booker isn't immune to having trash takes. Every veteran who has been through the meat grinder of the nineties has a tendency to look at modern high-flying spots and think, "That wouldn't have worked in the 1998 locker room." Sometimes that perspective is valuable. Sometimes it is just a guy shaking his fist at a cloud because nobody is selling a powerbomb for 30 seconds.
The current discourse online treats every critique as a declaration of war. If someone points out that a television segment had a pacing issue or that a specific finish felt repetitive, it is suddenly a tribal attack. We are watching a version of professional wrestling where the output is so bloated that people feel the need to defend their favorite company like it is a family member. It is not.
Booker T's analysis usually centers on performance psychology. He cares about how things look to a casual audience, not just the hardcore tape-traders. If he looks at a match and says it needs more heat, that is not an agenda. That is a critique from a guy who has been in the main event of a wrestlemania-level show with a fractured orbital bone before, knowing how to work through the pain.
Missing the point of the critique
The biggest flaw in the modern fan's reactive nature is the assumption that wrestling should be immune to criticism. If you cannot take a punch, you shouldn't be in the ring, and if you cannot take a critique about your favorite show, you might want to log off. Booker T knows that if you aren't evolving, you are dying.
Is he always right? Absolutely not. He has been wrong on plenty of calls, and his commentary style can be polarizing. Some people want the analytical breakdown of a wrestling historian, while others prefer the high-energy, catchphrase-heavy persona he cultivated during his prime. Expecting him to be a neutral observer while he is being paid to share his opinions is a fool's errand.
The obsession with "who is loyal to who" ignores the fact that this is a business that relies on talent moving around to stay relevant. The industry is currently in a state of high turnover, and veterans are going to have strong opinions on how that talent is utilized. If Tony Khan is booking a match that doesn't resonate, it is okay for a legend of the business to point that out without being labeled a corporate shill.
The bottom line
We are currently living through a window of time where there are more ways to consume wrestling than ever. You have the polished, massive scale of WWE and the alternative, fan-driven approach of AEW. Neither is perfect. Both are currently doing things that make me pull my hair out, and frankly, both are doing things that keep me watching every single week.
If you want to spend your time getting angry at a retiree who just wants to talk about wrestling, go ahead. It is a free country, and the block button exists for a reason. But you are missing the forest for the trees. Booker T is not your enemy; he is just a guy who remembers how things used to be and expects a certain standard of professional performance.
Maybe we should focus more on the product and less on the personalities behind the microphones. The show will go on regardless of whether or not Twitter is throwing a tantrum over an opinion on a spinning bookend. Keep the focus on the ring, because at the end of the day, that is all that ends up on the highlight reel.